More than a Soft Landing: a Turning Point in Business

Articles

There are many indicators that the economy is cooling, which is good from the viewpoint of the Federal Reserve since that is what they hoped to accomplish by raising interest rates so high, and so fast. But what has apparently not happened is the much-anticipated recession that a long list of economists and corporate CEOs seemed to be wishing for. Indeed, a large number of CEOs turned to headcount reductions in late 2022 and early 2023 to drastically cut costs in advance of that ‘vibecession’.

But today, at the end of August 2023, there is a great deal of evidence that a recession is unlikely, and therefore we look to be headed for a so-called ‘soft landing’ that avoids high levels of unemployment. As Ruth Simon and Sarah Chaney Cambon summarized,

Fresh economic data this week reinforced optimism that inflation can fall without the U.S. suffering a recession. Economic output accelerated in recent months on the back of solid consumer spending. Inflation cooled to 3% in June, according to the Fed’s preferred gauge. And wage growth, while still elevated, slowed, the Labor Department said Friday.

U.S. stock indexes were up on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 Index have risen for three straight weeks, with the broader index closing Friday at its highest value since April 2022.

“We’ve seen so far the beginnings of disinflation without any real costs in the labor market. And that’s a really good thing,” Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said Wednesday after the central bank decided to raise interest rates to a 22-year high.

A Turning Point?

Blackrock, the world's largest asset manager with approximately $9 trillion under its management, is not generally a source of warm-hearted analysis about the evolution of business practices; instead, they offer their hard-nosed perspectives on where to invest, and why. They offer, in their 2023 Midyear Outlook, the somewhat startling observation that the world has moved into a new economic era, one of greater volatility and uncertainty, and one roiled by supply constraints [emphasis mine]:

The investment opportunities in this economic environment are different from those in the past, we think. We have updated our investment themes as a result, kicking off with holding tight*. Markets have come around to the view that central banks will not quickly ease policy in a world shaped by supply constraints – notably worker shortages in the U.S. We see central banks being forced to keep policy tight to lean against inflationary pressures. This is not a friendly backdrop for broad asset class returns, marking a break from the four decades of steady growth and inflation known as the Great Moderation.

The analysis continues,

The shrinking supply of workers in several major economies due to aging means a low unemployment rate is no longer a sign of the cyclical health of the economy. Broad worker shortages could create incentives for companies to hold onto workers, even if sales decline, for fear of not being able to hire them back.

Blackrock analysts imply they are inclined to invest in companies that hold onto workers in downturns because it will cost more -- and take more cycles -- to get them back on any rebound. That is a sea change for US companies.

Try for free

What’s Going On?

How did the recession-predicting economists — and the CEOs who listened to them — get it wrong? Basically, they seem to be mistaking this new era for the earlier Great Moderation.

The confusion is complex, so I will try to lay it out in lay terms (just as well since I have no training in economics). I am paraphrasing Paul Krugman’s recent explanation.

In late 2022, most economics believed that the Fed’s increases in interest rates would decrease inflation, but that the cost would be a substantial rise in unemployment, which is what Econ 101 teaches.

But while the economy has cooled, the rise in unemployment hasn’t grown. Why not? What’s different in our current circumstances? Krugman points to numbers from the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), which surveys what small business owners are actually doing with their prices: raising or lowering them. Small business owners don’t necessarily track what the Fed or Blackrock have to say about the Economy with-a-capital-e, but they have their fingers on the pulse of their customers and competitors.

The NFIB survey results track the inflation numbers very closely. And here’s what the NFIB has to say:

The long anticipated, predicted, recession is nowhere to be seen (almost). Recessions can start quickly (2020 shutdown) and end quickly (2020 reopening). Or they can start slowly, for example, due to opposing forces like expansionary fiscal policy vs. contractionary monetary policy. The Fed staff (not the Fed Open Market Committee.) has changed their recession forecast to a “slowdown.” There is more talk about a “soft landing” and less of a recession. The shifting outlook is often confusing but even less clear is, can the Fed reach its 2% inflation target (P.C.E. deflator) without a significant slowdown in economic activity (e.g., slower wage cost growth)? The manufacturing sector is clearly slowing, soft all year (Institute for Supply Management index) but services are doing well (I.S.M. index). Business investment is solid (lots of government incentives), and housing is ignoring 7% mortgage rates.

Then Krugman threads the needle, saying what we have is

an economy in which inflation is coming down because of improved supply, not reduced demand.

If demand was down, the vibecessionists might have been right, and we’d be seeing a significant uptick in unemployment. However, the long-term supply of workers in the U.S. is highly constrained, so that would act as a brake on layoffs, even in a recession, at least for the tier of world-beater companies that Blackrock is looking to invest in.

But that’s moot since we are experiencing supply-side improvement as the soft landing is touching down.

What Will Be The Impacts on Business?

The most important change to business — as we move into this next era in the global economy — might be the need to retain workers in downturns.

In How the U.S. Economy Is Sticking the Soft Landing, Ruth Simon and Sarah Chaney Cambon spoke with a range of business owners and leaders, who almost without exception talk about how they are taking significant steps to retain workers:

Only 7% of small-business owners intend to reduce their workforce this year, according to the survey of roughly 670 entrepreneurs conducted for The Wall Street Journal by Vistage Worldwide, a business-coaching and peer-advisory firm. Small-business owners tend to be reluctant to lay off workers, in part because of their close ties to employees. Many say they still face hiring challenges.

[…]

“The mind-set a number of years ago was laying people off was painful and they knew it was going to be painful getting them to come back,” said Ethan Karp, chief executive of Magnet, a nonprofit providing technical assistance to manufacturers in northeast Ohio. “Now, there’s a lot of sentiment that it’s painful to lay them off and darn near impossible to replace them.”
[…]

Apple has avoided mass
job cuts embroiling the tech industry. The iPhone maker is managing costs tightly and curtailing hiring in certain areas, while adding in others, Chief Executive Tim Cook said earlier this year.

“I view layoffs as a last-resort kind of thing,” Cook said. “You can never say never. We want to manage costs in other ways to the degree that we can.”


Freight railroads have retained workers
this year despite declines in shipping volumes, a reversal from the old practices. Railroad operators made deep cuts during the pandemic and then struggled to rehire when traffic bounced back. One result, executives said, was erratic service; railroad operators lost out on additional revenue because they didn’t have enough train crews to meet demand.

These companies are making adjustments to a cooling economic background, but the value of existing, trained, and engaged employees has risen in this new era. Companies therefore have a greater incentive to become more efficient, cross-training workers to make their businesses more resilient, streamlining outdated processes, and installing new technologies to increase productivity and lower employee stress and burnout.

There is a new premium to retaining workers in an era when their numbers are decreasing, and demand is high. That will change everything.

I expect that companies will find it affordable to invest more significantly in activities that make a real difference at a foundational economic level, such as these:

  • Childcare — The situation for childcare in the U.S. is horrible: it’s unaffordable for many, and in many locations difficult to find. Fully subsidized childcare — on- or off-site could be a game changer for many working mothers, in particular.
  • Training and Development — One of the main reasons people leave jobs is that they don;t feel there is a path for professional development. This starts with possible apprenticeship programs, for young people, and not just for blue-collar jobs, either.
  • Housing — In many parts of the country even full-time employment with middle-class pay does not guarantee opportunities for housing.  As of May 2023, 31% of all households are spending 30% or more of their income on housing, 50% of renting households are spending 30% or more of their income on housing, and 21% of owning households are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. Some companies are taking action and building housing for workers to make it available and affordable. Amazon and Tesla are two examples.

These and other progressive programs are likely to be the new battleground for attracting and retaining employees, as the supply of workers grows even more constrained.

Share:
Facebook iconTwitter IconLinkedIn icon